Computer Floss » Debian http://computerfloss.com Delightful digital distractions in free/libre/open source software Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:27:42 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.1 An Open Source Eco-System? /2010/09/an-open-source-eco-system/ /2010/09/an-open-source-eco-system/#comments Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:48:17 +0000 http://computerfloss.wordpress.com/?p=406 To summarise the prior writings from my doctoral thesis: I’ve shown how there are both notable differences and similarities between certain measures of FLOSS repositories (such as number of contributors attracted, rate of contributions, complexity control work, etc.) The pattern of similarities and differences that emerged clearly differentiated one group (containing Debian, GNOME, and KDE) […]

The post An Open Source Eco-System? appeared first on Computer Floss.

]]>
/2010/09/an-open-source-eco-system/feed/ 4
The Catalyst Effect in FLOSS Repositories /2010/04/the-catalyst-effect-in-floss-repositories/ /2010/04/the-catalyst-effect-in-floss-repositories/#comments Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:56:07 +0000 http://computerfloss.wordpress.com/?p=421 In the course of my PhD studies, I proposed that when a project makes a transition from one repository to another, you could expect to see significant changes to a project’s evolutionary characteristics. Indeed, I covered this in earlier posts, discussing the transition from SourceForge to Debian. Here, we saw that the number of developers […]

The post The Catalyst Effect in FLOSS Repositories appeared first on Computer Floss.

]]>
/2010/04/the-catalyst-effect-in-floss-repositories/feed/ 0
Continuing the Empirical Results: Anti-Regressive Work /2010/04/continuing-the-empirical-results-anti-regressive-work/ /2010/04/continuing-the-empirical-results-anti-regressive-work/#comments Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:34:35 +0000 http://computerfloss.wordpress.com/?p=404 It has been a while since I wrote about my research into FLOSS, for which there are a few reasons. When last I wrote I was approaching my PhD defence, and for the whole PhD process to come to an end I had to wait until January this year, when my thesis was officially approved. […]

The post Continuing the Empirical Results: Anti-Regressive Work appeared first on Computer Floss.

]]>
/2010/04/continuing-the-empirical-results-anti-regressive-work/feed/ 1
The Six-Way Epic: Digging Further into FLOSS Repositories /2009/09/digging-further-into-floss-repositories/ /2009/09/digging-further-into-floss-repositories/#comments Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:06:57 +0000 http://floss.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/?p=233 Not too long ago, I announced the publishing of my first journal article co-authored with Andrea Capiluppi and Cornelia Boldyreff. My mother was very proud — even if she did not understand a single word of it. I will give a brief summary of the article in this post, and if I succeed in whetting […]

The post The Six-Way Epic: Digging Further into FLOSS Repositories appeared first on Computer Floss.

]]>
/2009/09/digging-further-into-floss-repositories/feed/ 1
Journal Publication Confirmed /2009/03/journal-publication-confirmed/ /2009/03/journal-publication-confirmed/#comments Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:14:53 +0000 http://floss.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/?p=94 Excellent. The journal publication I co-authored with Andrea Capiluppi and Cornelia Boldyreff (“Identifying exogenous drivers and evolutionary stages in FLOSS projects”) has now been confirmed for publication in the May 2009 edition of Journal of Systems and Software. It is currently available online.

The post Journal Publication Confirmed appeared first on Computer Floss.

]]>
/2009/03/journal-publication-confirmed/feed/ 3
Debian vs. SourceForge – Round 3 /2009/02/debian-vs-sourceforge-round-3/ /2009/02/debian-vs-sourceforge-round-3/#comments Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:21:48 +0000 http://learninglab.lincoln.ac.uk/blogs/kbeecher/?p=45 The tour through the comparison between Debian and SourceForge comes to a close by questioning whether Debian acts as a catalyst to evolutionary activity when a project is inserted into the repository. It has already been strongly suggested that projects packaged in Debian are recipients of significantly greater rates of activity. Of the 50 projects […]

The post Debian vs. SourceForge – Round 3 appeared first on Computer Floss.

]]>
/2009/02/debian-vs-sourceforge-round-3/feed/ 0
Debian vs. SourceForge – Round 2 /2009/02/debian-vs-sourceforge-round-2/ /2009/02/debian-vs-sourceforge-round-2/#comments Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:15:04 +0000 http://learninglab.lincoln.ac.uk/blogs/kbeecher/?p=32 And so, we revisit the posers put up in a previous post: Are Debian’s evolutionary characteristics significantly different to those of SourceForge? Does Debian act as a catalyst? To answer these questions, we took a closer look at the software inside them. I’ll briefly explain the method here, but details of the steps will be […]

The post Debian vs. SourceForge – Round 2 appeared first on Computer Floss.

]]>
/2009/02/debian-vs-sourceforge-round-2/feed/ 0
Debian vs. SourceForge – Round 1 /2009/02/debian-vs-sourceforge-round-1/ /2009/02/debian-vs-sourceforge-round-1/#comments Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:27:17 +0000 http://learninglab.lincoln.ac.uk/blogs/kbeecher/?p=22 We all know about SourceForge and Debian. Although they have different purposes, they both act as repositories of free software, and most of the practitioners will know that Debian hosts what is considered to be the best projects — judged most worthy by its army of package maintainers. Conversely, many (but by no means all) […]

The post Debian vs. SourceForge – Round 1 appeared first on Computer Floss.

]]>
/2009/02/debian-vs-sourceforge-round-1/feed/ 0